Much better leadership isn't more intellectual thinking. Better management isn't the dictator. It isn't producing the general public image of "Mr. good person" or "get 'er done" either. The real secret is to appreciate those under your duty in addition to your peers.
Have you heard of the special meditation methods introduced by Maharshi Mahesh Yogi? Almost they are a techniques to quieten your mind, to take it to this alpha level. In management by awareness we tell you to use this sub or incredibly conscious state to actively fix your managerial issues. You would continue to remain in the physical beta world, but whenever you need to find a response to an unpleasant issue, you naturally slip into alpha level and below, without any person discovering it. And you will find the best decision to make. Seems like some magic tale? Well friends it is real.
When they disciplined, punished, or "nipped bad behavior in the bud," it was for the kid's advantage. It belonged to a procedure created to raise little Johnny or Susie to be the man or lady she or he would one day need to be.
Management best leadership ideas refers intelligence, trustworthiness, discipline, humaneness, and courage. dependence on intelligence alone results in rebelliousness. Exercise of charity alone leads to weak point. Fixation on trust results in folly. Dependence on the strength of guts leads to violence. Extreme discipline and sternness in command lead to cruelty. When one has all five virtues together, each suitable to its function, then one can be a leader.
When looking at JFK conspiracy Leadership Theories you also need to ask yourself why would this list of people, or any list of people, conspire? How would they get together to plan? Have you ever tried to agree on a dining establishment with half a dozen people? What commonness do they have that would enable them to trust each other? Why would they feel the need to work with outsiders, people unlike themselves? What would they get by cooperation? Why would prospective conspirators quit part of what they desire in order to achieve some part of the objectives of another? Who would supervise? My experience with simple committees attempting to accomplish simple things, legal things, getting people to interact isn't as easy as you may want.
I'm not the first one to discuss this, and I definitely will not be the last, but I will try to give you another view, or my opinion. Something is definitely real - unarguably, to get people to follow you, you have to be a leader. To achieve it - for you to lead, you have tobe in front of them.
Moms and dads, before you spend your hard-earned cash on yet another parenting book or flog yourself with regret since of some psychological opinion you simply heard on tv, remember our former generations. They didn't stress over parenting or stress whether they were "doing it right." They just did it. Got kids? Love 'em and Lead 'em. Do those two things and, believe me, you'll be great.